we all know that spam is the bain of our lives , but I have just received this spam (I've cut and pasted it) from someone who clearly nearly knows what he's doing
the code is clearly being generated but in this one, there seems to be a bit of a bug (v8?)
for those non-tech people, the only important bit is %RND - this is short hand for RANDOM
This code is normally hidden inside the emails so you never see it
Its just an interesting insight into the way the volume of spam is being generated.
the ONLY changes I've made is to the poor unfortunate being (the return-Path: <???) that was going to get hammered and the ???'s in the "for <" line - that was going to be ME
the code is clearly being generated but in this one, there seems to be a bit of a bug (v8?)
for those non-tech people, the only important bit is %RND - this is short hand for RANDOM
This code is normally hidden inside the emails so you never see it
Its just an interesting insight into the way the volume of spam is being generated.
the ONLY changes I've made is to the poor unfortunate being (the return-Path: <???) that was going to get hammered and the ???'s in the "for <" line - that was going to be ME
Code:
X-Eon-Dm: dm41 Return-Path: <?????sey@yahoo.com> Received: from marius (84.232.156.80 [84.232.156.80]) by dm41.mta.everyone.net (EON-INBOUND) with ESMTP id dm41.45d0ca2d.e3097e for <??????@???????.co.uk>; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:28:12 -0800 Received: from 192.168.0.%RND_DIGIT (203-219-%DIGSTAT2-%STATDIG.%RND_FROM_DOMAIN [203.219.%DIGSTAT2.%STATDIG]) by mail%SINGSTAT.%RND_FROM_DOMAIN (envelope-from %FROM_EMAIL) (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id %STATWORD for <%TO_EMAIL>; %CURRENT_DATE_TIME Message-Id: <%RND_DIGIT[10].%STATWORD@mail%SINGSTAT.%RND_FROM_DOMAIN> From: %FROM_NAME <"%FROM_EMAIL>"@NONE> Subject: %SUBJECT Sender: %FROM_NAME <"%FROM_EMAIL>"@NONE> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html Date: %CURRENT_DATE_TIME To: undisclosed-recipients: ; %MESSAGE_BODY