Underscores in url's

[Darren B]

I've just read this article, i have to be honest i thought it did read them as seperate words

Oh you learn something new each day

http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-974...547-1023_3-0-5

[RuralWeb]

i have to be honest i thought it did read them as seperate words

Originally it did not but things have changed as you have found out. There was a recent thred on the subject where the originator was getting all hot and bothered about actinic using underscores and asking for them to be changed. In reallity it does not matter what you use these days.

[Darren B]

Morning Malc

Trust all is well,

D

[george]

I experimented in this a while back. - vs _ that is. Didn't make any difference to results that I could see. Mind you, I (like the wee hamster types) could be trained to eat food when a bell rings so what do I know?

[Darren B]

(like the wee hamster types) could be trained to eat food when a bell rings so what do I know?

You and me both G

[TraceyHand]

*polishes her bell*

this sounds like fun

[Darren B]

Miss bumps have'nt you got work to do

[TraceyHand]

oops..hehe...caught me

I just nipped back for 2 seconds...honest guv

[Darren B]

If your good you can go and get a coffee and have a 5min break, then back to work my girl

[TraceyHand]

coffee?
lol (behave!)

nahh..just water here at work...well, and a leftover lucozade from Monday but haven't tried that yet lol

I'm allowed to be here now anyway...it's my "lunchbreak"

[Mark H]

I still prefer - to _ because when some programmes underline a URL the underscores often disappear, so it is not clear to some what to type in next time......