Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Small business server?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Small business server?

    visiting one of my clients, i have seen a quote of about 3k for a small business server.

    windows etc, with all the gubbins to run 5 computers.

    though in the grand scheme of things, this is not a lot of cash, the company (and myself tbh) think this is daftness, when there is already a usb backup/online backup happening and things are working semi-fine at the moment, on a peer-t0-peer (windows share) type solutiojn.

    what the company really needs, is:
    - emails with a server, not just clients on a laptop
    - data safety, unified backups
    - data security (aka encryption)
    - hardware redundancy (aka, we dont care if a laptop breaks)

    i'm a mac and linux person, and i know this can be done with ubuntu. but the only person that could take care of it, would be me. linux isnt very user friendly, for the people who work there.

    anyone got any ideas on how to get this for an economy price?

    #2
    We looked at setting up something similar for someone who didn't want to go the server route. It's a bit of a lash up but it would work:
    • Wireless and/or cabled network to Laptops, no data held on laptops.
    • Network Attached Storage (NAS) drive box with RAID.
    • Small PC (eg Acer Aspire One) acts as a "hub" for NAS, primarily to implement Truecrypt encryption for the NAS - the other laptops would actually see the unencrypted data through this PC once the NAS had been mounted each day onto this PC.
    • Emails externally Exchange hosted - one account each - can access via Outlook Web Access, and accounts can "talk" to each other.
    • Laptops can access the "hub" PC when on the road using TeamViewer or similar


    Excluding the user laptops, NAS plus small PC should be about £750 depending on amount of data.

    Aquazuro - designer stainless steel accessories

    Comment


      #3
      MS do exchange in the cloud now

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by RuralWeb View Post
        MS do exchange in the cloud now
        There's that cloud again
        "If my answers frighten you then you should cease asking scary questions"

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by sir.chunk View Post
          There's that cloud again
          It never rains but it pours.
          Fergus Weir - teclan ltd
          Ecommerce Digital Marketing

          SellerDeck Responsive Web Design

          SellerDeck Hosting
          SellerDeck Digital Marketing

          Comment


            #6
            The NAS route does provide interesting options.
            We've been trialling the QNAP NAS 409 for a while. Not a bad piece of kit. Inbuilt apache style server et all. I know there was a thread on here about NAS boxes......
            Email in cloud covers the other aspect. It's really down to sys admin overhead....

            MS box as domain controller with Windows XP/Vista laptops allows for the sys admin just to set up box, network, users and policies and let the users go for it.
            With a domain controller deployed AV and firewall package in place you can tighten up the holes that users sometimes can expose through naievity or inexperience.
            Horses for courses......
            Fergus Weir - teclan ltd
            Ecommerce Digital Marketing

            SellerDeck Responsive Web Design

            SellerDeck Hosting
            SellerDeck Digital Marketing

            Comment


              #7
              actually, i just checked, and it really looks good.

              http://www.microsoft.com/Online/default.mspx

              5 seats for a monthly fee, looks like neatly sidestepping the hardware cost, as a very reasonable price.

              Comment


                #8
                Only just off Gabs question

                At present we have computers linked by ethernet link and switch

                We do not use any shared software except actinic Master + four clients

                What benifits or disadvantages if any would we get with a server
                Chris Ashdown

                Comment


                  #9
                  automatic backups, plenty of redundancy.

                  what we had to ask ourselves was:
                  - what if x laptop was lost/smashed
                  - what if the data was stolen/compromised
                  - how can some of the accounts/creative/admin people work from home?
                  - what happens when your tech guy is off sick?

                  etc.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Don't forget a fire.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      how could i forget

                      FIRE

                      it burns my pingers.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Sorry I dont understand, we have automatic backups of most important items like sage and actinic onto a seperate network raid drive

                        How does Fire risk differ from server to computer network.

                        I mean apart from spending plenty of dosh for a server and software, how would it benifit me, would it be faster etc

                        Is server side software better than stand alone?
                        Chris Ashdown

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Peer-to-peer networks are fine as long as you keep a handle on the shared resources. If you have 20 folders, 2 printers and a bunch of devices hanging of each computer in a peer to peer network then your network traffic is going to be full of all computers broadcasting and talking to all the other computers and devices.

                          If you have a good switch/router and hang a NAS storage box and network printer with their own IP's then you can have a pretty robust network without much in the way of speed problems.

                          Windows server / client PC models are useful for security, scalability, exchange (unless you use could) and other useful attributes that you get for managing networked machines. As long as it is correctly administered that is.

                          As I mentioned above, you can also use a DC (domain controller) to manage client machines for AV, firewall, network shares etc
                          You can also use it for internal/external access as web server itself, or web based email access if using exchange.

                          I don't have much knowledge of Ubunto in a server/client scenario so can't comment on that..... be interested to know more though.
                          Depends what your business needs are really.....
                          Fergus Weir - teclan ltd
                          Ecommerce Digital Marketing

                          SellerDeck Responsive Web Design

                          SellerDeck Hosting
                          SellerDeck Digital Marketing

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X