Hi Guys,
I'm not completely convinced that this is the correct section to post this thread but I really couldn't spot a better one.
To the best of my knowledge, the new version of the EU Distance Seller Directive comes into force on 13 June 2014 as "The Consumer Protection (Amendment) Regulations 2014" (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2.../contents/made) and aside from a general tightening up of the online selling process T&Cs there is really only one area that is causing me concern.
Trader must tell consumer if consumer is to bear the cost of any return. If such information has not been provided, the trader must bear the cost of the return.
and
More prescriptive information on withdrawal rights, including on timing and costs. For instance, where the trader does not agree to bear the cost of return delivery, they must specify the estimated cost of return delivery to the consumer
After visiting several different web pages, my understanding is that this "estimated cost of return" must form part of the checkout process so that the consumer is allowed to make a fully informed decision whether to enter into a purchase agreement. So, if my understanding is correct, the customer selects a basket full of items and during the checkout process you have to display an estimate of how much it might cost them to return the goods, should they change their mind during the 14 day cooling off period.
My question is this, assuming that I have not grabbed the wrong end of the stick, has anyone considered how this might be implemented into the Sellerdeck checkout process?
Displaying it so that the customer has to acknowledge it before paying is one thing but then having it be reiterated to part of the telesales and email order confirmation process is another.
Of course we can just accept that we will have to bear the return cost of goods in all circumstances but it gets painful when you are scraping the sides of the tin for all available profit margin.
I do hope that I am misunderstanding all of this and that I am working myself up over nothing.
Ian
I'm not completely convinced that this is the correct section to post this thread but I really couldn't spot a better one.
To the best of my knowledge, the new version of the EU Distance Seller Directive comes into force on 13 June 2014 as "The Consumer Protection (Amendment) Regulations 2014" (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2.../contents/made) and aside from a general tightening up of the online selling process T&Cs there is really only one area that is causing me concern.
Trader must tell consumer if consumer is to bear the cost of any return. If such information has not been provided, the trader must bear the cost of the return.
and
More prescriptive information on withdrawal rights, including on timing and costs. For instance, where the trader does not agree to bear the cost of return delivery, they must specify the estimated cost of return delivery to the consumer
After visiting several different web pages, my understanding is that this "estimated cost of return" must form part of the checkout process so that the consumer is allowed to make a fully informed decision whether to enter into a purchase agreement. So, if my understanding is correct, the customer selects a basket full of items and during the checkout process you have to display an estimate of how much it might cost them to return the goods, should they change their mind during the 14 day cooling off period.
My question is this, assuming that I have not grabbed the wrong end of the stick, has anyone considered how this might be implemented into the Sellerdeck checkout process?
Displaying it so that the customer has to acknowledge it before paying is one thing but then having it be reiterated to part of the telesales and email order confirmation process is another.
Of course we can just accept that we will have to bear the return cost of goods in all circumstances but it gets painful when you are scraping the sides of the tin for all available profit margin.
I do hope that I am misunderstanding all of this and that I am working myself up over nothing.
Ian
Comment