Bug In og:image declaration for Section Image

[Goz]

In the Standard Meta Tags layout, there is an og:image declaration for the Section Image Filename Raw variable - currently on line 66 (SD18.02)

<meta property="og:image" content="<actinic:block if="%3cactinic%3avariable%20name%3d%22IsBaseHREFStandard%22%20%2f%3e" ><actinic:variable name="CatalogURL" /></actinic:block><actinic:block if="%3cactinic%3avariable%20name%3d%22IsBaseHREFSSL%22%20%2f%3e" ><actinic:variable name="SSLCatalogURL" /></actinic:block>" /><actinic:variable name="SectionImageFileNameRaw" />" />

There is a blockif around it so that it is only used if SectionImageHeight and SectionImageWidth are both >= 200

This line has an extra "/>" in it immediately before SectionImageFileNameRaw

The code should be :

<meta property="og:image" content="<actinic:block if="%3cactinic%3avariable%20name%3d%22IsBaseHREFStandard%22%20%2f%3e" ><actinic:variable name="CatalogURL" /></actinic:block><actinic:block if="%3cactinic%3avariable%20name%3d%22IsBaseHREFSSL%22%20%2f%3e" ><actinic:variable name="SSLCatalogURL" /></actinic:block><actinic:variable name="SectionImageFileNameRaw" />" />

[NormanRouxel]

You have ProductImageFileNameRaw in your "The code should be" bit.

[Goz]

Doh! What an idiot.... well spotted Norman. I also got the wrong line number.

I have corrected the original post.

[brucet]

Thanks Andrew, I have reported this as a bug, SD-7565. Do you see any symptoms in the browser? The last time we tested the og:image tag, it was working OK.

[Goz]

I haven't checked it in the browser Bruce. I only found the bug because I changed some section images and they were bigger than 200x200 (IIRC) SellerDeck reported it as a coding error

[brucet]

OK, thanks