I think its the amount of sections on this one more than anything, its huge. Its beyond what actinic can realistically handle in all honesty, at least in what you'd call a timely fashion. To put it into perspective i have a 5,000 product site, with probably 4,500 images and that snapshot is only 28MB. It is also coded in the worst way i could possibly imagine and has more nested tables than your local IKEA.
I don't think clean coding is the key personally on performance, it's all about the number of sections IMO.
I don't think clean coding is the key personally on performance, it's all about the number of sections IMO.
Comment