We have recently transferred our inventory of 5000 products from Excel to SQL. The SQL database is located on a remote virtual server and is 6MB in size, using an External Link via ODBC for quite a number of standard and custom variables.
We have noticed a significant increase in speed of navigation through Actinic, which is good. However, it still takes an unacceptably long time to start Actinic up (and by unacceptably long I mean over 3 HOURS. Much longer than the 7 minutes it took using Excel with external linking.)
We have a bandwidth meter that shows data being downloaded at between 500KB/s and 700KB/s consistently during the startup. But with an SQL database of only 6MB in size, to read the entire database logically it should take no more than 10-15 seconds. Over the three hours 10 minutes it did take, Actinic had consumed nearly 7GB of bandwidth reading from the SQL database, almost as if it had read the entire database 1200 times from start to finish.
We use this external SQL database for several applications and I refuse to use 2 databases (one local, one remote) - it would leave room for error and completely defeat the point.
What's going on? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Matt
We have noticed a significant increase in speed of navigation through Actinic, which is good. However, it still takes an unacceptably long time to start Actinic up (and by unacceptably long I mean over 3 HOURS. Much longer than the 7 minutes it took using Excel with external linking.)
We have a bandwidth meter that shows data being downloaded at between 500KB/s and 700KB/s consistently during the startup. But with an SQL database of only 6MB in size, to read the entire database logically it should take no more than 10-15 seconds. Over the three hours 10 minutes it did take, Actinic had consumed nearly 7GB of bandwidth reading from the SQL database, almost as if it had read the entire database 1200 times from start to finish.
We use this external SQL database for several applications and I refuse to use 2 databases (one local, one remote) - it would leave room for error and completely defeat the point.
What's going on? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Matt
Comment