CDN JQUERY not working

[Yanni]

I've got some actinic plugins that require jquery.js

I've been informed the site will load faster if instead of hosting this on our site I use the following:
<script type=”text/javascript” src=”http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.6.4/jquery.js”></script>

However that doesn't seem to work either inside actinic's interface or after an upload .
Any suggestions ?

[I-CC]

The JS file does exist at the location you are calling it from, so would suggest its to do with the usage of it, i.e. the call or action you are attempting is not working.

If you send through details of what you are attempting and the uploaded page where it is failing, then someone might be able to assist.

[Yanni]

Thanks, this is the page with the cdn script.

http://www.grafea.co.uk/shop/test/index.html

As you can see the bullets on the main photo do not move as they should automatically. Also I get an error inside Actinic saying "Jquery.js" is not defined.

However, when I change the script to: <script type="text/javascript" src="jquery.js"></script> it all works fine!

Another question, my jquery.min.js takes only 385ms on the .co.uk site, however on the test page .co.uk/shop/test.index.html it takes a massive 1200ms to load!
I have renamed the jquery.min.js to jquery.js so that the plug ins work fine so both sites use in essence the same library, why the massive difference ? I have used Webpagetest.org to obtain the results.

[malbro]

Thanks, this is the page with the cdn script.

http://www.grafea.co.uk/shop/test/index.html

As you can see the bullets on the main photo do not move as they should automatically. Also I get an error inside Actinic saying "Jquery.js" is not defined.

However, when I change the script to: <script type="text/javascript" src="jquery.js"></script> it all works fine!

Another question, my jquery.min.js takes only 385ms on the .co.uk site, however on the test page .co.uk/shop/test.index.html it takes a massive 1200ms to load!
I have renamed the jquery.min.js to jquery.js so that the plug ins work fine so both sites use in essence the same library, why the massive difference ? I have used Webpagetest.org to obtain the results.

The reason that it is not loading is your page is actually requesting http://www.grafea.co.uk/shop/test/%E...ry.js%E2%80%9D. The page is adding http://www.grafea.co.uk/shop/test/ to all the calls even when they are absolute rather than relative.

[Yanni]

I've had to change the quotes before the link and it all worked fine.

Thanks...