Is this a feature or a bug?
It seems that nested sections inherit the meta keywords from the parent section - and pad out the lowest level with words from the sections above.
Is this a feature? Is there a way to stop it happening?
On an example product the Meta Keywords are set at the lowest section as "valentines balloon, devil valentine, valentines gift box",
at the section above they are set to " Valentines Balloons, Valentine's Day, Love Balloons" and at the top section they are set to " Valentines Balloons, Love Balloon Gifts, Birthday Balloons, helium Gift Delivery UK"
On the generated page I would expect only that sections keywords to be used, or if the field is left empty then I'd expect it to use the higher sections keywords.
What I'm actually getting is this "Birthday Balloons,devil valentine,helium Gift Delivery UK,Love Balloon Gifts,Love Balloons,Valentine's Day,valentines balloon,Valentines Balloons,valentines gift box"
I hope the colours show where the words are coming from, but it seems a compete mess!
It seems that nested sections inherit the meta keywords from the parent section - and pad out the lowest level with words from the sections above.
Is this a feature? Is there a way to stop it happening?
On an example product the Meta Keywords are set at the lowest section as "valentines balloon, devil valentine, valentines gift box",
at the section above they are set to " Valentines Balloons, Valentine's Day, Love Balloons" and at the top section they are set to " Valentines Balloons, Love Balloon Gifts, Birthday Balloons, helium Gift Delivery UK"
On the generated page I would expect only that sections keywords to be used, or if the field is left empty then I'd expect it to use the higher sections keywords.
What I'm actually getting is this "Birthday Balloons,devil valentine,helium Gift Delivery UK,Love Balloon Gifts,Love Balloons,Valentine's Day,valentines balloon,Valentines Balloons,valentines gift box"
I hope the colours show where the words are coming from, but it seems a compete mess!
Comment