We created a new section in our catalog. It was intended to contain DUPLICATES of products already existing in the catalog so that a customer could order from either section. We imported a CSV that contained new product details but had the same reference number as the existing products - but we used the "Section text" header and loaded these into the NEW section we had created, instead of overwriting the existing products (and then making duplicates, a mistake in hindsight)...This is what has happened:
The imported products went exactly where we pointed them with "Section text", but now they cannot be found in the locations where they existed before. And those HIDDEN products that we had built with Product|Component|Attribute|Choice structure (in order to have stock monitoring) are now located in the new section, even though the CHOICE DETAILS are still there for the, now gone, hidden product. And to make it more confusing, even after multiple refreshes and updates, the products are located in BOTH sections and are fully orderable on the site and via search!
Should I revert to a snapshot previous to the import, create the duplicates and then import the updated details? Or should I leave it alone? It does seem that the end result has been what we want but I am not sure that stock monitoring is behaving correctly. Any other ideas or suggestions?
Thank You!
The imported products went exactly where we pointed them with "Section text", but now they cannot be found in the locations where they existed before. And those HIDDEN products that we had built with Product|Component|Attribute|Choice structure (in order to have stock monitoring) are now located in the new section, even though the CHOICE DETAILS are still there for the, now gone, hidden product. And to make it more confusing, even after multiple refreshes and updates, the products are located in BOTH sections and are fully orderable on the site and via search!
Should I revert to a snapshot previous to the import, create the duplicates and then import the updated details? Or should I leave it alone? It does seem that the end result has been what we want but I am not sure that stock monitoring is behaving correctly. Any other ideas or suggestions?
Thank You!
Comment