quick moan..."html for name"

[TraceyHand]

If you're going to call it "html for name", why do you still insist I use !!< >!! around it?

ok..moan over...I feel better now

[leehack]

huh since when? you been screwing with layouts again?

[TraceyHand]

no...I don't think so

in the component/attribute details, I mean

[leehack]

I have only ever used the embed characters in description fields, never needed anywhere else. Just checked to make sure i am not going mad, i'm not. Something must be up Bumpsy.

[los_design]

no...I don't think so

in the component/attribute details, I mean

you been drinking again

[TraceyHand]

well, I've just tried it to make sure
I wanted to make a certain component name bold...they're not usually
so I added <strong> tags around it...and it ignored it..until I added the !!< >!! too


I've attached a screen shot..
Have I broke it?

[TraceyHand]

you been drinking again

nahh...couple o' hours too early for me yet

[leehack]

I know why that is but i'm buggered if i can think of a way to explain it. If you put tags in there, actinic cannot tell if that is to be a tag or not, so it required the html markers to tell it so for page parsing. Just imagine actinic is a bit thick and needs to be told everything is the easiest way to think of it.

[TraceyHand]

Just imagine actinic is a bit thick and needs to be told everything.

that bit, I understand!!

bit pointless asking for "html" for name though really..why not just put "display" name or something?

[leehack]

What you put in that field is surrounded by a html tag. You then confuse it adding your own tags. I'm on actinic's side on this one, especially with you being a nutter.

[TraceyHand]

I'm on actinic's side on this one, especially with you being a nutter.

LOL

thanks, Lee
I love you too!

[leehack]

LOL at JS's quick delete. Not wanting to be branded with Tracey in the nuthouse.

[JSnow]

LOL.

[TraceyHand]

I'm used to being here on my own...talking to myself..and me