yep, things go wrong...
Yes, Ive had problems too, but on the whole, they have been no worse than other hosts I am with. In fact, they have been better than pretty much anyone in terms of help, communication and support.
But of course, I totally accept they might not be the right host for you.
When it comes down to it, I cant afford to go up a level in terms of hosting. You get what you pay for. I think in Pinbrooks case, I get MORE than I pay for in comparison to other hosts I have used and still do use. If I had pots of gold, I would opt for co-location where if one server went down, another mirrored server would take over in a flash - but I dont!
The Actinic integration at Pinbrook is great.
I guess Jo would be the first to say that she would change from the current data centre / hosting system if she could find a better value for money one. As she says, Its meant to be a 100% service to her and therefore to her clients (us, that is), but you cant control all things. What about that incident in Manchester last year where a fire knocked out a huge tranch of networks - not the fault of any hosting or comms companies thats for sure!
I am not suggesting they are the BEST option, but I am saying they are a GOOD VALUE option for ME at the current time - we are all different and we all need different options.
Yes, Ive had problems too, but on the whole, they have been no worse than other hosts I am with. In fact, they have been better than pretty much anyone in terms of help, communication and support.
But of course, I totally accept they might not be the right host for you.
When it comes down to it, I cant afford to go up a level in terms of hosting. You get what you pay for. I think in Pinbrooks case, I get MORE than I pay for in comparison to other hosts I have used and still do use. If I had pots of gold, I would opt for co-location where if one server went down, another mirrored server would take over in a flash - but I dont!
The Actinic integration at Pinbrook is great.
I guess Jo would be the first to say that she would change from the current data centre / hosting system if she could find a better value for money one. As she says, Its meant to be a 100% service to her and therefore to her clients (us, that is), but you cant control all things. What about that incident in Manchester last year where a fire knocked out a huge tranch of networks - not the fault of any hosting or comms companies thats for sure!
I am not suggesting they are the BEST option, but I am saying they are a GOOD VALUE option for ME at the current time - we are all different and we all need different options.
Comment