Hi All,
It's pc upgrade time in January and although my design work is all done on a Mac, I still prefer to run a separate pc for Actinic development. The one thing I'm sure of is that it'll be XP (I've done enough installations on client machines to know the folly of Vista!). My question is more of whether a dual core, quad core processor or a xeon processor would give me any performance advantage with XP and Actinic. (Or just spend the difference on buckets of RAM)
Your thoughts as always, are most welcome.
It's pc upgrade time in January and although my design work is all done on a Mac, I still prefer to run a separate pc for Actinic development. The one thing I'm sure of is that it'll be XP (I've done enough installations on client machines to know the folly of Vista!). My question is more of whether a dual core, quad core processor or a xeon processor would give me any performance advantage with XP and Actinic. (Or just spend the difference on buckets of RAM)
Your thoughts as always, are most welcome.
Comment