i must admit if everyone followed my advise then Actinic would rarely become stable. I've always considered an 01,02, 03 patch level nothing more than beta grade.
With the exception of v8 i've tended to stay away from these patch levels, for an easy life it is better to stay where you are ie 6.15, 7.07 or 8.53 before going 9 (possibly 04 maybe 05 - 04 hasn't been out for long enough)
Fergus has it exactly on the money, Yes to API, Yes to plugins in PHP/AJAX and yes to reminders within the software to keep people up to date.
The later will need to be managed as i am aware that i am contradicting myself , patches need to have a strong message along with yes/no do you want the patch and yes/no i don't want anymore reminders. Version upgrades need to be very clear its not free/free to cover subscribers.
At least if you remind people of patches, most peeps will stay up to date and be unaware of a lot of bugs, and less people will take my approach and opt out of the software until its stable thus increasing participant levels in beta grade patches.
With the exception of v8 i've tended to stay away from these patch levels, for an easy life it is better to stay where you are ie 6.15, 7.07 or 8.53 before going 9 (possibly 04 maybe 05 - 04 hasn't been out for long enough)
Fergus has it exactly on the money, Yes to API, Yes to plugins in PHP/AJAX and yes to reminders within the software to keep people up to date.
The later will need to be managed as i am aware that i am contradicting myself , patches need to have a strong message along with yes/no do you want the patch and yes/no i don't want anymore reminders. Version upgrades need to be very clear its not free/free to cover subscribers.
At least if you remind people of patches, most peeps will stay up to date and be unaware of a lot of bugs, and less people will take my approach and opt out of the software until its stable thus increasing participant levels in beta grade patches.
Comment