Hi,
I have just implemented Actinic Payments on my site which uses Actinic 9.0.5 Business Plus, it works OK except that the bounce page before Actinic Payments does not have the same layout as all the other pages, to be frank it looks horrible and seems to have inherited some corrupted default hybrid layout.
It also does not automatically refresh to the Actinic Payments site which makes it even worse. What do I change in the design/layout to fix it?
If I look in the designer at the SSL Bounce page, as a comparison, the difference seems to be the use of an unwanted theme of "Works best with executive" (wherever that came from it's rubbish) instead of "Act_Primary (upgraded)" which is used on all my other pages.
There doesn't seem to be any way to change a page's top level container/layout from one existing layout to another that I can see. All the help just talks about making changes to the layout itself - but I've got a perfectly good layout as used on all the other pages.
Could this have happened as a result of upgrading through the versions from 4 to 7 to 8 and then to 9?
I have just implemented Actinic Payments on my site which uses Actinic 9.0.5 Business Plus, it works OK except that the bounce page before Actinic Payments does not have the same layout as all the other pages, to be frank it looks horrible and seems to have inherited some corrupted default hybrid layout.
It also does not automatically refresh to the Actinic Payments site which makes it even worse. What do I change in the design/layout to fix it?
If I look in the designer at the SSL Bounce page, as a comparison, the difference seems to be the use of an unwanted theme of "Works best with executive" (wherever that came from it's rubbish) instead of "Act_Primary (upgraded)" which is used on all my other pages.
There doesn't seem to be any way to change a page's top level container/layout from one existing layout to another that I can see. All the help just talks about making changes to the layout itself - but I've got a perfectly good layout as used on all the other pages.
Could this have happened as a result of upgrading through the versions from 4 to 7 to 8 and then to 9?
Comment